Geogrid-reinforced Bases

Inadequate subgrade conditions, improper design and construction, and unpredicted increases in traffic demand contribute to premature pavement failures. Particularly when weak subgrades are encountered
and good construction materials become scarce, pavement design becomes a challenge.
The studies at IITH focus on conducting a series of large-scale model experiments to obtain MIF values for different geogrid and geocell-reinforced bases built on various subgrade conditions. Then, MIF-based models were developed for base-layer coefficients for geogrid- and geocell-reinforced pavements when checking the pavement sections for fatigue and rutting failure modes. The MIF values ranged between 1.5 and 3.5 for geogrid-reinforced bases placed over different subgrade conditions. 

learn more

Asphalt reinforcement

This study aims at understanding the influence of different geosynthetic reinforcements on the fatigue performance of asphalt layers and the corresponding mechanisms involved. Three different types of geosynthetic reinforcement, a polypropylene geogrid (PP), a coated polyester geogrid and a glass geogrid composite (GGC), were employed to understand the fatigue behavior of asphalt layers via an asphalt beam fatigue test (ABFT) along with the use of digital image correlation (DIC) techniques. 
The ABFT results suggest that incorporating geosynthetic reinforcement in the asphalt layers improved the fatigue performance by factors of 11, 27, and 38 for the PP, PET, and GGC specimens, respectively. With the aid of DIC, the mechanisms involved in enhancing the fatigue performance of asphalt layers were effectively evaluated.
Reductions in layer thickness for the geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt layers on the order of 5.9% (PP),
17.6% (PET), and 23.5% (GGC) were established for the geosynthetics evaluated in this study based on
test results adopted in a design example.

learn more